Re: Show various offset arrays for heap WAL records

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2023-01-27T20:02:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:24 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe I have addressed this in the attached patch.

I'm not sure what's best in terms of formatting details but I
definitely like the idea of making pg_waldump show more details. I'd
even like to have a way to extract the tuple data, when it's
operations on tuples and we have those tuples in the payload. That'd
be a lot more verbose than what you are doing here, though, and I'm
not saying you should go do it right now or anything like that.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



Commits

  1. Merge prune, freeze and vacuum WAL record formats

  2. Add rmgrdesc README

  3. Refine the guidelines for rmgrdesc authors.

  4. Fix Heap rmgr's desc output for infobits arrays.

  5. Clarify nbtree posting list update desc issue.

  6. Fix nbtree posting list update desc output.

  7. Set cutoff xmin more aggressively when vacuuming a temporary table.