Re: Proposing pg_hibernate
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-06-11T14:56:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im> wrote: > And it's probably accepted by now that such a bahviour is not > catastrophic, merely inconvenient. I think the whole argument for having pg_hibernator is that getting the block cache properly initialized is important. If it's not important, then we don't need pg_hibernator in the first place. But if it is important, then I think not loading unrelated blocks into shared_buffers is also important. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company