Re: Proposing pg_hibernate

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-06-11T14:56:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im> wrote:
> And it's probably accepted by now that such a bahviour is not
> catastrophic, merely inconvenient.

I think the whole argument for having pg_hibernator is that getting
the block cache properly initialized is important.  If it's not
important, then we don't need pg_hibernator in the first place.  But
if it is important, then I think not loading unrelated blocks into
shared_buffers is also important.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company