Re: Fast DSM segments
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-06-10T17:37:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:03 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > That all makes sense. Now I'm wondering if I should use exactly that > word in the GUC... dynamic_shared_memory_preallocate? I tend to prefer verb-object rather than object-verb word ordering, because that's how English normally works, but I realize this is not a unanimous view. It's a little strange because the fact of preallocating it makes it not dynamic any more. I don't know what to do about that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Preallocate some DSM space at startup.
- 84b1c63ad418 14.0 landed