Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node)

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Date: 2014-03-04T20:50:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Alright- so do you feel that the simple ctidscan use-case is a
> sufficient justification and example of how this can be generally
> useful that we should be adding these hooks to core..?  I'm willing to
> work through the patch and clean it up this weekend if we agree that
> it's useful and unlikely to immediately be broken by expected changes..

Yeah, I think it's useful.  But based on Tom's concurrently-posted
review, I think there's probably a good deal of work left here.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Support multi-argument UNNEST(), and TABLE() syntax for multiple functions.