Re: COPY FREEZE and PD_ALL_VISIBLE
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2015-10-22T21:16:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: > It turns out it was pretty easy to set PD_ALL_VISIBLE on the new pages, > since the code in hio that requests the relation to be extended already has > info on the tuple's intended freeze status. > > Then you just need to refrain from clearing PD_ALL_VISIBLE when that tuple > is actually written into the page. Not only because clearing would defeat > the purpose, but also because it will cause an error--apparently the > incipient page is not yet in a state where visibilitymap_clear is willing to > deal with it. Wouldn't it be better to instead fill the page with tuples first and THEN set PD_ALL_VISIBLE? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Set PD_ALL_VISIBLE and visibility map bits in COPY FREEZE
- 7db0cd2145f2 14.0 landed