Re: Alter index rename concurrently to

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrey Klychkov <aaklychkov@mail.ru>, Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-08-03T13:00:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> ISTM, if you want to increase consistency in this area, you've to go
> further. E.g. processing invalidations in StartTransactionCommand() in
> all states, which'd give you a lot more consistency.

Hmm, that seems like a pretty good idea.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


Commits

  1. Lower lock level for renaming indexes