Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>,
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2022-07-22T12:07:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 6:47 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > I feel the discussion has slightly deviated which makes it unclear > whether this patch is required or not? My opinion is that showing some fractional digits at least when loops>1 would be better than what we have now. It might not be the best thing we could do, but it would be better than doing nothing. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
EXPLAIN: Always use two fractional digits for row counts.
- 95dbd827f2ed 18.0 landed
-
Adjust EXPLAIN test case to filter out "Actual Rows" values.
- 44cbba9a7f51 18.0 cited
-
Allow EXPLAIN to indicate fractional rows.
- ddb17e387aa2 18.0 landed
-
Fix pgbench performance issue induced by commit af35fe501.
- fb056564ec5b 18.0 cited