Re: fixing CREATEROLE

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>, walther@technowledgy.de, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-12-23T21:55:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 9:14 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> The contents looks good to me other than that problem, and I agree to
> backpatch it.

Cool. Thanks for the review.

> Why did you choose to use two dots for ellipses in some command
> <literal>s rather than three?  I know I've made that choice too on
> occassion, but there aren't many such cases and maybe we should put a
> stop to it (or a period) before it spreads too much.

Honestly, I wasn't aware that we had some other convention for it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



Commits

  1. Add new GUC createrole_self_grant.

  2. Restrict the privileges of CREATEROLE users.

  3. Pass down current user ID to AddRoleMems and DelRoleMems.

  4. Refactor permissions-checking for role grants.

  5. Improve documentation of the CREATEROLE attibute.

  6. Make role grant system more consistent with other privileges.