Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>,
"Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2024-02-21T07:53:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Migrate logical slots to the new node during an upgrade.
- 29d0a77fa660 17.0 cited
-
Make test_decoding ddl.out shorter
- d6677b93c79b 17.0 landed
- c5c5832600e9 14.9 landed
- b1dc946eee3d 16.0 landed
- 3bb8b9342f8a 15.4 landed
-
Fix snapshot handling in logicalmsg_decode
- 949ac32e1267 15.3 landed
- 8b9cbd42b61f 14.8 landed
- 4df581fa0f4b 13.11 landed
- 497f863f0598 12.15 landed
- 8de91ebf2ac1 11.20 landed
- 7fe1aa991b62 16.0 landed
-
doc: Adjust a few more references to "postmaster"
- 17e72ec45d31 16.0 cited
-
Revert "Logical decoding of sequences"
- 2c7ea57e56ca 15.0 cited
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:06 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > But I am wondering why this flag is always set to true in > > DecodeTXNNeedSkip() irrespective of the commit or abort. Because the > > aborted transactions are not supposed to be replayed? So if my > > observation is correct that for the aborted transaction, this > > shouldn't be set to true then we have a problem with sequence where we > > are identifying the transactional changes as non-transaction changes > > because now for transactional changes this should depend upon commit > > status. > > I have checked this case with Amit Kapila. So it seems in the cases > where we have sent the prepared transaction or streamed in-progress > transaction we would need to send the abort also, and for that reason, > we are setting 'ctx->processing_required' as true so that if these > WALs are not streamed we do not allow upgrade of such slots. I don't find this explanation clear enough for me to understand. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com