Horton

Re: EXEC_BACKEND vs bgworkers without BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-08-09T15:07:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 8:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think doing nothing is fine.  Given the lack of complaints, we're
> more likely to break something than fix anything useful.

+1.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Commits

  1. Remove support for background workers without BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS.

  2. Detach shared memory from bgworkers without shmem access.