Re: block-level incremental backup

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-04-10T18:38:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Don't call data type input functions in GUC check hooks

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 2:21 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
<jgdr@dalibo.com> wrote:
> In my current design, the scan is done backward from end to start and I keep all
> the records appearing after the last occurrence of their respective FPI.

Oh, interesting.  That seems like it would require pretty major
surgery on the WAL stream.

> Summary files looks like what Andrey Borodin described as delta-files and
> change maps.

Yep.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company