Re: block-level incremental backup
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-04-10T18:38:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Don't call data type input functions in GUC check hooks
- 21f428ebde39 12.0 cited
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 2:21 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com> wrote: > In my current design, the scan is done backward from end to start and I keep all > the records appearing after the last occurrence of their respective FPI. Oh, interesting. That seems like it would require pretty major surgery on the WAL stream. > Summary files looks like what Andrey Borodin described as delta-files and > change maps. Yep. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company