Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Arseny Sher <a.sher@postgrespro.ru>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-05-13T12:59:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 8:52 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I think its reasonable to expect you interpret my words sensibly, > rather than in some more dramatic form where I seem to break rules > with every phrase. Sure, I agree. I try to interpret the words of everyone here sensibly and without unnecessary drama. I don't really know why we're still talking about this. My principle concern here has never been to understand whether or not you were proposing foreign indexes for v11 -- although I have now got a very clear idea that you weren't -- but to resolve the actual problem -- which seems to be a bug in 8b08f7d4. I regret that we seem to have gotten sucked into a conversation about whether I was being unreasonable in thinking that you might have meant what I thought you might have meant for a period of 3 hours last Wednesday, rather than about the technical issue. I apologize to you and to the list for my contribution to that state of affairs. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Don't allow partitioned index on foreign-table partitions
- 4eaa53727542 11.0 landed