Re: increasing the default WAL segment size

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-09-20T20:05:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/16 9:31 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I'd like to propose that we increase the default WAL segment size,
>> which is currently 16MB.
>
> While the discussion about the best default value is ongoing, maybe we
> should at least *allow* some larger sizes, for testing out.  Currently,
> configure says "Allowed values are 1,2,4,8,16,32,64.".  What might be a
> good new upper limit?

1GB?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Make WAL segment size configurable at initdb time.

  2. Perform only one ReadControlFile() during startup.

  3. Introduce BYTES unit for GUCs.

  4. Remove useless duplicate inclusions of system header files.

  5. Refactor other replication commands to use DestRemoteSimple.

  6. Add a SHOW command to the replication command language.

  7. Add a new DestReceiver for printing tuples without catalog access.

  8. Support fls().

  9. Extend yesterday's patch making BLCKSZ and RELSEG_SIZE configurable to also

  10. Commit the reasonably uncontroversial parts of J.R. Nield's PITR patch, to

  11. XLOG (also known as WAL -:)) Bootstrap/Startup/Shutdown.

  12. Transaction log manager core code.