Re: Bug tracker tool we need
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-04-18T03:22:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> wrote: > Let's not let perfect be the enemy of good. In this case, *anything* > that actually tracks bugs (and they are all quite good at that, > if nothing else) is an improvement over what we have now, and thus, > quite good. :) I respectfully disagree. I would rather be chained to an angry cat for a day than have to use Bugzilla on a regular basis. RT is better, but the UI is still laughably bad. Try sticking a 74-email long thread into an RT ticket and then try to do anything with it. Now try in Gmail (even the new, revised, slightly-harder-to-use Gmail). It's not close. > Personally, I'm okay with, and have extensively hacked on, Bugzilla > and RT, but anything should be fine as long as we have someone > to take ownership. Therein lies another problem... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company