Re: WIP: Access method extendability

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2015-09-08T17:36:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> wrote:
> Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> On 2015-09-07 17:41, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>>>
>>> Some notices:
>>>
>>> 1) create-am.3.patch.gz
>>>    As I understand, you didn't add schema name to access method. Why?
>>> Suppose, if we implement SQL-like interface for AM screation/dropping
>>> then we should provide a schema qualification for them
>>
>>
>> Why would access methods need to be schema qualified?
>
>
> Opfamily and opclass could be schema-qualified.

So what?

Making access methods schema-qualified seems like a completely
separate project, and an unnecessary one.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


Commits

  1. Support CREATE ACCESS METHOD

  2. Restructure index access method API to hide most of it at the C level.