Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-04-13T17:06:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 9:29 PM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Still does it matter when the change is effective?

I don't really care deeply about when the change takes effect, but I
do care about whether the time when the system *says* the change took
effect is the same as when it *actually* took effect.  If those aren't
the same, it's confusing.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


Commits

  1. Fix assertion failure when updating full_page_writes for checkpointer.

  2. Attach FPI to the first record after full_page_writes is turned on.

  3. Revamp the WAL record format.

  4. Move the backup-block logic from XLogInsert to a new file, xloginsert.c.