Re: using an end-of-recovery record in all cases

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

To: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>

Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2022-04-19T12:30:26Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

v5-0001-Remove-the-end-of-recovery-checkpoint-in-all-case.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v5-0001
v5-0002-Remove-previous-timeline-ID-from-checkpoint.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v5-0002

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 11:56 PM Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think RequestCheckpoint() should be called conditionally.  What is the need
> of the checkpoint if we haven't been through the recovery, in other words,
> starting up from a clean shutdown?

Good point. v5 attached.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Commits

Revert "Add new simple TAP test for tablespaces."
- 0c53a6658e47 15.0 cited
Remove unnecessary call to ReadCheckpointRecord().
- 1d919de5eb3f 15.0 landed