Horton

Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-07-03T15:28:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Attached patch fixes GiST behaviour without altering operators behaviour.
>
>
> I think we definitely should apply this patch before 9.2 release, because it
> is a bug fix. Otherwise people will continue produce incorrect GiST indexes
> with in-core geometrical opclasses until 9.3. Patch is very simple and only
> changes few lines of code.
>
> Any thoughts?

Do we need to apply this patch to 9.2?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company