Re: documentation structure

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-03-21T14:31:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. docs: Consistently use <optional> to indicate optional parameters

  2. docs: Consolidate into new "WAL for Extensions" chapter.

  3. freespace: Don't return blocks past the end of the main fork.

  4. docs: Merge separate chapters on built-in index AMs into one.

  5. docs: Demote "Monitoring Disk Usage" from chapter to section.

  6. doc: move system views section to its own chapter

Attachments

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 9:38 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'd follow the extend.sgml precedent: have a file corresponding to the
> chapter and containing any top-level text we need, then that includes
> a file per sect1.

OK, here's a new patch set. I've revised 0003 and 0004 to use this
approach, and I've added a new 0005 that does essentially the same
thing for the PL chapters.

0001 and 0002 are changed. Should 0002 use the include-an-entity
approach as well?

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com