Horton

Re: role self-revocation

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Joshua Brindle <joshua.brindle@crunchydata.com>, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-03-28T18:31:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 10:51 AM Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> > > > So I propose to commit something like what I posted here:
> > > > http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobgeK0JraOwQVPqhSXcfBdFitXSomoebHMMMhmJ4gLonw@mail.gmail.com
> > >
> > > +1, although the comments might need some more work.  In particular,
> > > I'm not sure that this bit is well stated:
>
> Also +1 on this.

OK, done using Tom's proposed wording.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Commits

  1. Make role grant system more consistent with other privileges.

  2. Ensure that pg_auth_members.grantor is always valid.

  3. Remove the ability of a role to administer itself.

  4. Add tests of the CREATEROLE attribute

  5. Replace explicit PIN entries in pg_depend with an OID range test.

  6. Shore up ADMIN OPTION restrictions.

  7. Add pg_has_role() family of privilege inquiry functions modeled after the

  8. Align GRANT/REVOKE behavior more closely with the SQL spec, per discussion