Horton

Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem)

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, Kohei.Kaigai@emea.nec.com, thom@linux.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-02-14T13:19:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
> I could not find out where is the origin of grammer conflicts, although
> it does not conflict with any options within ALTER FUNCTION.
>
> Do you think the idea of ALTER ... NOT LEAKPROOF should be
> integrated within v9.2 timeline also?

Yes.  Did you notice that I attached a patch to make that work?  I'll
commit that today or tomorrow unless someone comes up with a better
solution.

>> I also think we ought to stick create_function_3 into one of the
>> parallel groups in the regression tests, if possible.  Can you
>> investigate that?
>>
> Not yet. This test does not have dependency with other tests,
> so, I'm optimistic to run create_function_3 concurrently.

Me, too.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company