Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 2:43 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Tom didn't say he didn't like this change.  He said he didn't like a
> different change, which is not the one I committed.

Sorry, I should have read the emails more carefully. I missed the fact
that there were two different proposals. It was the idea of
right-aligning things that I was unhappy about.

So, no objection to what you actually committed... except that I don't
think that using % specifiers in SOME places in a format string is
better than using them in ALL the places. It's not broken because
$lockidx can't contain a % sign, but in general I think when we switch
from print to printf it's better for us to have the format string be a
constant so that it's clear that we can't accidentally get an extra %
escape in there depending on the values of variables being
interpolated.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com