Horton

Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com, shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com, michael@paquier.xyz, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-01-05T19:58:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 4:28 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the attached, fixed the existing two messages, and adjusted one
> message to display an error code, all in the consistent format.

Hi,

I'm not a Windows expert, but my guess is that 0001 is a very good
idea. I hope someone who is a Windows expert will comment on that.

0002 seems problematic to me. One potential issue is that it would
break if someone renamed postgres.exe to something else -- although
that's probably not really a serious problem. A bigger issue is that
it seems like it would break if someone used pg_ctl to start several
instances in different data directories on the same machine. If I'm
understanding correctly, that currently mostly works, and this would
break it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Commits

  1. Re-enable autoruns for cmd.exe on Windows

  2. Re-enable autoruns for for cmd.exe on Windows

  3. pg_regress: Disable autoruns for cmd.exe on Windows

  4. pg_ctl: Disable autoruns for cmd.exe on Windows