Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>,
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-03-14T17:29:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > We didn't found any issue with the above testing. Great! I've committed the latest version of the patch, with some cosmetic changes. It would be astonishing if there weren't a bug or two left, but I think overall this is very solid work, and I think it's time to put this out there and see how things go. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Add a regression test for snapshot too old with hash indexes.
- 42bdaebf1618 10.0 landed
-
hash: Add write-ahead logging support.
- c11453ce0aea 10.0 landed
-
Improve coding in _hash_addovflpage.
- e898437460f5 10.0 cited
-
Remove _hash_wrtbuf() in favor of calling MarkBufferDirty().
- 25216c989384 10.0 cited
-
Improve hash index bucket split behavior.
- 6d46f4783efe 10.0 cited