Horton

Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Steven Pousty <steve.pousty@gmail.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre.giraud@dalibo.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-17T19:16:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:38 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Glad you like 'em ;-).  Do you have an opinion about what to do
> with the operator tables --- ie do we need a column with the operator
> name at the left?

Well, if the first row says date + date -> date, then I don't think we
also need another column to say that we're talking about +

Seems redundant.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.

  2. Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.