Re: Bypassing cursors in postgres_fdw to enable parallel plans

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com>
Cc: KENAN YILMAZ <kenan.yilmaz@localus.com.tr>, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213@163.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-07-02T17:57:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 5:27 AM Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, do you suggest we can have a backpointer of conn also in active_fsstate...?

I think that fsstate and active_fsstate have to be pointing to the
same conn_state object. Do you think otherwise?

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com