Re: Parallel Append implementation

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>

Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2017-02-14T17:05:58Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having the extra
> 1-2 workers exist does not seem better.

Err, exit, not exist.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

Update parallel.sgml for Parallel Append
- ac535cd47806 11.0 landed
- e80f2b335ecd 12.0 landed
Support Parallel Append plan nodes.
- ab7271677812 11.0 landed
Remove BufFile's isTemp flag.
- 11e264517dff 11.0 cited
Improve comments for parallel executor estimation functions.
- 11c1d555cebe 11.0 landed
Separate reinitialization of shared parallel-scan state from ExecReScan.
- 41b0dd987d44 11.0 cited
Eat XIDs more efficiently in recovery TAP test.
- 08aed6604de2 10.0 cited
Avoid syntax error on platforms that have neither LOCALE_T nor ICU.
- 457a44487328 10.0 cited
Preparatory refactoring for parallel merge join support.
- a71f10189dc1 10.0 cited