Re: Non-superuser subscription owners

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Date: 2023-03-31T20:00:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:49 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> It looks like the super user check is out of a transaction, I haven't checked why
> it only failed on one BF animal, but it seems we can put the check into the
> transaction like the following:

That looks like a reasonable fix but I can't reproduce the problem
locally. I thought the reason why that machine sees the problem might
be that it uses -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, but I tried that option here
and the tests still pass. Anyone ideas how to reproduce?

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix possible crash in tablesync worker.

  2. Display 'password_required' option for \dRs+ command.

  3. Restart the apply worker if the 'password_required' option is changed.

  4. Fix possible logical replication crash.

  5. Add new predefined role pg_create_subscription.

  6. Expand AclMode to 64 bits

  7. More cleanup of a2ab9c06ea.

  8. Respect permissions within logical replication.

  9. Improve table locking behavior in the face of current DDL.