Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Arseny Sher <a.sher@postgrespro.ru>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-05-09T15:15:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 9 May 2018 at 16:10, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>>> Shouldn't the fix be to allow creation of indexes on foreign tables? >>>> (Maybe they would be virtual or foreign indexes??) >> >>> It might be useful to invent the concept of a foreign index, but not >>> for v11 a month after feature freeze. >> >> Yeah. That's a can of worms we can *not* open at this stage. > > Lucky nobody suggested that then, eh? Robert's just making a joke. Someone did suggest that. It was you. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Don't allow partitioned index on foreign-table partitions
- 4eaa53727542 11.0 landed