Horton

Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question about meaning of information for explain.depesz.com

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>, Hubert Lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-12-13T21:02:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Uh, should I just revert that commit entirely first, and then we can
>> commit the new fix afterward?
>
> Yes. I have already extracted the test case of that commit to the new
> patch which is what we need from that commit.

OK, done.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Back-port fix for accumulation of parallel worker instrumentation.

  2. Test instrumentation of Hash nodes with parallel query.

  3. Try again to fix accumulation of parallel worker instrumentation.

  4. Revert "Fix accumulation of parallel worker instrumentation."

  5. Fix accumulation of parallel worker instrumentation.