Re: Postgres perl module namespace

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-08-25T14:08:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 1:48 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 03:39:15PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 3:03 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> >> OK, I count 3 in favor of changing to PgTest::Cluster, 1 against,
> >> remainder don't care.
> >
> > I'd have gone with something starting with Postgres:: ... but I don't care much.
>
> PgTest seems like a better choice to me, as "Postgres" could be used
> for other purposes than a testing framework, and the argument that
> multiple paths makes things annoying for hackers is sensible.

I mean, it's a hierarchical namespace. The idea is you do
Postgres::Test or Postgres::<whatever> and other people using the
Postgres database can use other parts of it. But again, not really
worth arguing about.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



Commits

  1. Fix PostgreSQL::Test aliasing for Perl v5.10.1.

  2. For PostgreSQL::Test compatibility, alias entire package symbol tables.

  3. Make PostgresNode easily subclassable