Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: 2025-05-19T12:35:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
In ExecInitModifyTable, don't scribble on the source plan.
- d376ab570ef9 18.0 landed
-
Rely on executor utils to build targetlist for DML RETURNING.
- 4717fdb14cf0 11.0 cited
On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 7:31 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > While chasing down Valgrind leakage reports, I was disturbed > to realize that some of them arise from a case where the > executor scribbles on the plan tree it's given, which it is > absolutely not supposed to do: > > /* > * Initialize result tuple slot and assign its rowtype using the first > * RETURNING list. We assume the rest will look the same. > */ > mtstate->ps.plan->targetlist = (List *) linitial(returningLists); > > A bit of git archaeology fingers Andres' commit 4717fdb14, which we > can't easily revert since he later got rid of ExecAssignResultType > altogether. But I think we need to do something about it --- it's > purest luck that this doesn't cause serious problems in some cases. Is there some way that we can detect violations of this rule automatically? I recall that we were recently discussing with Richard Guo a proposed patch that would have had a similar problem, so it's evidently not that hard for a committer to either fail to understand what the rule is or fail to realize that they are violating it. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com