Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-08-28T20:38:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > There's also the big-picture question of whether we should just get rid > of fuzzy comparisons in the geometric types instead of trying to hack > indexes to work around them. +1 for that approach, but only if I don't have to do the work. Otherwise, +1 for doing the simplest thing that we're sure will eliminate wrong answers. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company