Re: Track the amount of time waiting due to cost_delay
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>,
Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-06-11T18:48:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add delay time to VACUUM/ANALYZE (VERBOSE) and autovacuum logs.
- 7720082ae532 18.0 landed
-
Add cost-based vacuum delay time to progress views.
- bb8dff9995f2 18.0 landed
-
Add is_analyze parameter to vacuum_delay_point().
- e5b0b0ce1509 18.0 landed
-
Refresh cost-based delay params more frequently in autovacuum
- 7d71d3dd080b 16.0 cited
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 2:47 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm struggling to think of a scenario in which the number of waits would be > useful, assuming you already know the amount of time spent waiting. Even > if the number of waits is huge, it doesn't tell you much else AFAICT. I'd > be much more likely to adjust the cost settings based on the percentage of > time spent sleeping. This is also how I see it. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com