Re: [PATCH] Lockable views

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-10-27T05:11:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> In the attached patch, only automatically-updatable views that do not have
> INSTEAD OF rules or INSTEAD OF triggers are lockable. It is assumed that
> those views definition have only one base-relation. When an auto-updatable
> view is locked, its base relation is also locked. If the base relation is a
> view again, base relations are processed recursively. For locking a view,
> the view owner have to have he priviledge to lock the base relation.

Why is this the right behavior?

I would have expected LOCK TABLE v to lock the view and nothing else.

See http://postgr.es/m/AANLkTi=KupesJHRdEvGfbT30aU_iYRO6zwK+fwwY_sGd@mail.gmail.com
for previous discussion of this topic.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


Commits

  1. Allow to lock views.