Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>,
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-06-12T16:00:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Not sure about a good fix for this. It seems annoying to copy the > rel's whole partkey data structure into query-local storage, but > I'm not sure we have any choice. On the bright side, there might > be an opportunity to get rid of repeated runtime fmgr_info lookups > in cross-type comparison situations. Is this the same issue I raised in https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BTgmoYKToP4-adCFFRNrO21OGuH%3Dphx-fiB1dYoqksNYX6YHQ%40mail.gmail.com or a similar issue that creeps up at execution time? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Fix up run-time partition pruning's use of relcache's partition data.
- e23bae82cf3d 11.0 landed
-
Fix access to just-closed relcache entry.
- bdc643e5e46f 11.0 landed
- b10edaf4bb44 10.5 landed
-
Improve ExecFindInitialMatchingSubPlans's subplan renumbering logic.
- 69025c5a07a1 11.0 landed
-
Improve commentary about run-time partition pruning data structures.
- 4e2323640333 11.0 landed
-
Fix run-time partition pruning code to handle NULL values properly.
- be3d90026a3c 11.0 landed
-
Assorted cosmetic cleanup of run-time-partition-pruning code.
- 321f648a312b 11.0 landed
-
Relocate partition pruning structs to a saner place.
- 939449de0e57 11.0 landed
-
Improve run-time partition pruning to handle any stable expression.
- 73b7f48f78d2 11.0 landed
-
Support partition pruning at execution time
- 499be013de65 11.0 cited