Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-03-07T15:03:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 1:03 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm, the patch already has new reloption vacuum_index_cleanup and
> default value is true but you meant I should change its name to
> index_cleanup?

No, I mean that you should make it so that someone writes VACUUM
(INDEX_CLEANUP false) instead of VACUUM (DISABLE_INDEX_CLEANUP).

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


Commits

  1. Add toast-level reloption for vacuum_index_cleanup

  2. heap_prepare_freeze_tuple: Simplify coding

  3. Fix missing word.

  4. Allow VACUUM to be run with index cleanup disabled.

  5. Don't mark pages all-visible spuriously