Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>,
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>,
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>,
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-10-12T21:27:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: >> In other words, it's not utterly fixed in stone --- we invented >> --load-via-partition-root primarily to cope with circumstances that >> could change hash values --- but we sure don't want to be changing it >> with any regularity, or for a less-than-excellent reason. > > Yea, that's what I expected. It'd probably good for somebody to run > smhasher or such on the output of the combine function (or even better, > on both the 32 and 64 bit variants) in that case. Not sure how that test suite works exactly, but presumably the characteristics in practice will depend the behavior of the hash functions used as input the combine function - so the behavior could be good for an (int, int) key but bad for a (text, date) key, or whatever. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Add hash partitioning.
- 1aba8e651ac3 11.0 landed
-
Add sanity check for pg_proc.provariadic
- 35f059e9bdfb 11.0 landed
-
Add hash_combine64.
- b7f3eb31405f 11.0 landed
-
Make RelationGetPartitionDispatchInfo expand depth-first.
- 77b6b5e9ceca 11.0 cited
-
Introduce 64-bit hash functions with a 64-bit seed.
- 81c5e46c490e 11.0 cited
-
pg_dump: Add a --load-via-partition-root option.
- 23d7680d04b9 11.0 cited