Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
pgsql-core <pgsql-core@postgresql.org>
Date: 2015-05-29T22:02:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> I'm personally kind of astonished that we're even thinking about beta >> so soon. I mean, we at least need to go through the stuff listed >> here, I think: >> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items > > Well, maybe we ought to call it an alpha not a beta, but I think we ought > to put out some kind of release that we can encourage people to test. > What you are suggesting is that we serialize resolution of the known > issues with discovery of new issues, and that's not an efficient use of > time. Especially seeing that we're approaching the summer season where > we won't get much input at all. Well, I think we ought to take at least a few weeks to try to do a bit of code review and clean up what we can from the open items list. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Add Valgrind buffer access instrumentation.
- 1e0dfd166b3f 14.0 landed
-
Fix wrong merge resolution making pg_receivexlog fail in 9.2.
- 6b700301c36e 9.2.11 cited