Horton

Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Rahila Syed <rahila.syed@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-03-11T19:28:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:26 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Oh.  That's easily removed.  Though I have to say that other people said
> that they liked it so much that they would have liked to have it in the
> original VACUUM one too (5ba2b281-9c84-772a-cf37-17780d782936@lab.ntt.co.jp).

Huh.  Well, that's another option, but then what do we do if the
number of phases is not a constant?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Report progress of REINDEX operations

  2. Report progress of CREATE INDEX operations

  3. Fix error handling of readdir() port implementation on first file lookup