Horton

Re: Bug in to_timestamp().

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in>
Cc: Artur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Alex Ignatov <a.ignatov@postgrespro.ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-08-18T18:40:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:35 AM, amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Hmm. I haven't really looked into the code, but with applying both patches it looks precisely imitate Oracle's behaviour. Thanks.

This is good to hear, but for us to consider applying something like
this, somebody would need to look into the code pretty deeply.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Improve behavior of to_timestamp()/to_date() functions

  2. Implement TZH and TZM timestamp format patterns

  3. as attache of this mail is patch (to the main tree) with to_char's