Re: Bugs/slowness inserting and indexing cubes
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jay Levitt <jay.levitt@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-02-08T19:53:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
pg_dump: Further reduce reliance on global variables.
- 1631598ea204 9.2.0 cited
-
Fix postmaster to attempt restart after a hot-standby crash.
- ef19c9dfaa99 9.1.3 cited
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> ISTM there are two ways we could fix this: >>> >>> 1. Introduce a duplicative test at the start of gistbuild(). >>> >>> 2. Rearrange the order of operations in index_build() so that the init >>> fork is made first. >>> >>> Both of these are kinda ugly, but #2 puts the ugliness into someplace >>> that shouldn't have to know about it, and furthermore someplace that's >>> unlikely to get reverted if/when gist is fixed to not have this problem. >>> So I think I favor #1. Other opinions anyone? > >> I don't think I understand your object to #2. It appears to be a >> trivial rearrangement? > > Yeah, but then we are wiring into index_build the idea that ambuildempty > is more important, or more likely to throw an error, or something, than > ambuild is. It seems weird. And fragile, since somebody could decide > to re-order those two steps again for reasons unrelated to gist. I guess. I think the compelling reason to do ambuildempty first is that it's fast. So might as well. I think you'e just going to end up hard-wiring the assumption that ambuild happens before ambuildempty, which doesn't seem any better than the other way around, but I don't care enough to argue about if you feel strongly about it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company