Re: Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

To: Maksim Milyutin <m.milyutin@postgrespro.ru>

Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2017-08-10T20:01:39Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Maksim Milyutin
<m.milyutin@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the feedback. Then I'll use a new relkind for local
> partitioned index in further development.

Any update on this?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

Local partitioned indexes
- 8b08f7d4820f 11.0 landed
Fix StoreCatalogInheritance1 to use 32bit inhseqno
- 1ef61ddce908 11.0 landed
- 9a215fb4b5ec 9.3.21 landed
- 8a71ee628854 9.6.7 landed
- 61f08c016322 10.2 landed
- 1284d18b5de9 9.4.16 landed
- 0d993709a773 9.5.11 landed
Get rid of copy_partition_key
- 8a0596cb656e 11.0 landed
Simplify index_[constraint_]create API
- a61f5ab98638 11.0 landed