Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-12-11T20:15:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow page lock to conflict among parallel group members.
- 3ba59ccc896e 13.0 landed
-
Allow relation extension lock to conflict among parallel group members.
- 85f6b49c2c53 13.0 landed
-
Add assert to ensure that page locks don't participate in deadlock cycle.
- 72e78d831ab5 13.0 landed
-
Assert that we don't acquire a heavyweight lock on another object after
- 15ef6ff4b985 13.0 landed
-
Fix unsafe usage of strerror(errno) within ereport().
- 81256cd05f07 11.0 cited
Attachments
- extension-lock-v12.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v12
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > Attached updated version patch. Please review it. I went over this today; please find attached an updated version which I propose to commit. Changes: - Various formatting fixes, including running pgindent. - Various comment updates. - Make RELEXT_WAIT_COUNT_MASK equal RELEXT_LOCK_BIT - 1 rather than some unnecessarily smaller number. - In InitRelExtLocks, don't bother using mul_size; we already know it won't overflow, because we did the same thing in RelExtLockShmemSize. - When we run into an error trying to release a lock, log it as a WARNING and don't mark it as translatable. Follows lock.c. An ERROR here probably just recurses infinitely. - Don't bother passing OID to RelExtLockRelease. - Reorder functions a bit for (IMHO) better clarity. - Make UnlockRelationForExtension just use a single message for both failure modes. They are closely-enough related that I think that's fine. - Make WaitForRelationExtensionLockToBeFree complain if we already hold an extension lock. - In RelExtLockCleanup, clear held_relextlock.waiting. This would've made for a nasty bug. - Also in that function, assert that we don't hold both a lock and a wait count. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company