Re: [PATCH 01/16] Overhaul walsender wakeup handling
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-06-26T14:01:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Don't waste the last segment of each 4GB logical log file.
- dfda6ebaec67 9.3.0 cited
-
Stamp HEAD as 9.3devel.
- bed88fceac04 9.3.0 cited
-
Wake WALSender to reduce data loss at failover for async commit.
- 2c8a4e9be273 9.2.0 cited
-
Make the visibility map crash-safe.
- 503c7305a1e3 9.2.0 cited
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Can you elaborate on that a bit? What scenarios did you play around >> with, and what does "win" mean in this context? > I had two machines connected locally and setup HS and my prototype between > them (not at once obviously). > The patch reduced all the average latency between both nodes (measured by > 'ticker' rows arriving in a table on the standby), the jitter in latency and > the amount of load I had to put on the master before the standby couldn't keep > up anymore. > > I played with different loads: > * multple concurrent ~50MB COPY's > * multple concurrent ~50MB COPY's, pgbench > * pgbench > > All three had a ticker running concurrently with synchronous_commit=off > (because it shouldn't cause any difference in the replication pattern itself). > > The difference in averagelag and cutoff were smallest with just pgbench running > alone and biggest with COPY running alone. Highjitter was most visible with > just pgbench running alone but thats likely just because the average lag was > smaller. OK, that sounds pretty promising. I'd like to run a few performance tests on this just to convince myself that it doesn't lead to a significant regression in other scenarios. Assuming that doesn't turn up anything major, I'll go ahead and commit this. Can you provide a rebased version? It seems that one of the hunks in xlog.c no longer applies. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company