Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: hlinnaka <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>,
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-10-18T17:17:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote: > On 08/06/2014 08:37 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: >> >> But now it looks like 0002 needs a rebase.... > > I've committed the refactoring patch, and here's a rebased and improved > version of the Windows SChannel implementation over that. > > Server-side support is now implemented too, but it's all very crude and > work-in-progress. CRLs are not supported, intermediary CAs are not > supported, and probably many other bells and whistles are missing too. But > the basics work, including cert authentication. Consider this a Proof of > Concept. Heikki, do you have any plans to work more on this? Or does anyone else? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company