Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > Have you set force_parallel_mode=regress; before running the > statement? Yes, I tried that first. > If so, then why you need to tune other parallel query > related parameters? Because I couldn't get it to break the other way, I then tried this. Instead of asking me what I did, can you tell me what I need to do? Maybe a self-contained reproducible test case including exactly what goes wrong on your end? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
C comment: fix wording about shared memory message queue
- bc0021ef09ec 11.0 landed
-
shm_mq: Have the receiver set the sender's less frequently.
- 497171d3e2aa 11.0 landed
-
shm_mq: Reduce spinlock usage.
- 34db06ef9a1d 11.0 landed
-
Remove use of byte-masking macros in record_image_cmp
- 0b5e33f667a2 11.0 cited
-
Remove memory leak protection from Gather and Gather Merge nodes.
- 9f4992e2a993 11.0 landed
-
Avoid projecting tuples unnecessarily in Gather and Gather Merge.
- b10967eddf96 11.0 landed
-
Tweak use of ExecContextForcesOids by Gather (Merge).
- 0510421ee091 11.0 landed
-
Pass eflags down to parallel workers.
- f455e1125e25 11.0 landed
-
Disable installcheck tests for test_session_hooks
- 745948422c79 11.0 cited
-
First-draft release notes for 10.1.
- 42de8a0255c2 11.0 cited
-
Remove TupleDesc remapping logic from tqueue.c.
- 6b65a7fe62e1 11.0 cited
-
Avoid memory leaks when a GatherMerge node is rescanned.
- 2d44c58c79ae 11.0 cited
-
Code review for nodeGatherMerge.c.
- 04e9678614ec 11.0 cited
-
Add a Gather Merge executor node.
- 355d3993c53e 10.0 cited
-
Push scan/join target list beneath Gather when possible.
- 992b5ba30dca 9.6.0 cited