Re: pg_plan_advice

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>, Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-04-06T12:47:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Apr 5, 2026 at 3:57 AM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking back at the pg_plan_advice development cycle, I don’t see many
> discussions about the design. It seems unusual given how complex the
> planner's structure is. It makes sense to follow the typical way and let
> it serve out of the contrib for some time and see if it works well.
>
> Introducing such a module into the core would effectively cancel
> alternative solutions, as seen with PGSS. Therefore, it is important to
> ensure the code is well-designed before proceeding. Do you agree?

I don't know how anyone could disagree with the idea that PostgreSQL
code should be well-designed, but that doesn't mean that I agree that
your particular design criticism is fair, and I definitely don't.

As for the amount of design discussion on the mailing list, I was
disappointed in that, too. In addition to posting to the list, I
privately asked numerous people to help review and test. Some did, but
on the whole, I was expecting a more vigorous debate and a lot of
people telling me what an idiot I am. Instead, the most common
feedback I got was some form of "can you ship it right now, please?".
That probably has less to do with the design being good (although I
believe that it is) or my code being good (although I hope that it is)
than with people just really wanting PostgreSQL to have something of
this sort. So I am somewhat afraid that this will turn out to have
more problems than anyone has noticed so far, and maybe for reasons
that will feel dumb in hindsight. But on March 12th, I asked myself
whether more people were going to be unhappy if I committed
pg_plan_advice this release cycle or if I didn't, and my educated
guess was the latter, so I committed it. If that turns out to have
been the wrong call, then I apologize to the whole community in
advance.

But I do not apologize for the fact that pg_plan_advice tries to
interpret plan trees -- which I personally think is one of the best
design decisions I have ever made while hacking on PostgreSQL -- or
that it can't interpret the variant ones that your extension produces.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. pg_plan_advice: Fix another unique-semijoin bug.

  2. pg_plan_advice: Export feedback-related definitions.

  3. pg_plan_advice: Fix a bug when a subquery is pruned away entirely.

  4. pg_plan_advice: Add alternatives test to Makefile.

  5. pg_plan_advice: Handle non-repeatable TABLESAMPLE scans.

  6. pg_stash_advice: Allow stashed advice to be persisted to disk.

  7. Add pg_stash_advice contrib module.

  8. pg_plan_advice: Avoid assertion failure with partitionwise aggregate.

  9. pg_plan_advice: Invent DO_NOT_SCAN(relation_identifier).

  10. Add an alternative_plan_name field to PlannerInfo.

  11. pg_plan_advice: Refactor to invent pgpa_planner_info

  12. Respect disabled_nodes in fix_alternative_subplan.

  13. get_memoize_path: Don't exit quickly when PGS_NESTLOOP_PLAIN is unset.

  14. test_plan_advice: Set TAP test priority 50 in meson.build.

  15. pg_plan_advice: Avoid a crash under GEQO.

  16. Test pg_plan_advice using a new test_plan_advice module.

  17. pg_plan_advice: Always install pg_plan_advice.h, and in the right place

  18. pg_plan_advice: Fix failures to accept identifier keywords.

  19. Add pg_plan_advice contrib module.

  20. Allow extensions to mark an individual index as disabled.

  21. Replace get_relation_info_hook with build_simple_rel_hook.

  22. Store information about Append node consolidation in the final plan.

  23. Store information about elided nodes in the final plan.

  24. Store information about range-table flattening in the final plan.

  25. Pass cursorOptions to planner_setup_hook.

  26. Fix PGS_CONSIDER_NONPARTIAL interaction with Materialize nodes.

  27. Fix mistakes in commit 4020b370f214315b8c10430301898ac21658143f

  28. Allow for plugin control over path generation strategies.

  29. Update some comments for fasthash

  30. Allow passing a pointer to GetNamedDSMSegment()'s init callback.

  31. Don't reset the pathlist of partitioned joinrels.

  32. Treat number of disabled nodes in a path as a separate cost metric.