Horton

Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Steven Pousty <steve.pousty@gmail.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre.giraud@dalibo.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-17T20:14:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:58 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> On the other point of dispute about the operator tables: for the
> moment I'm leaning towards keeping the text descriptions.

I mostly suggested nuking them just to try to make the table more
readable. But since you've found another (and better) solution to that
problem, I withdraw that suggestion.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.

  2. Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.