Re: Enabling Checksums
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-03-29T01:02:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2013-03-27 10:06:19 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> > to get them going again. If the install had checksums, I could have figured >> > out which blocks were damaged and manually fixed them, basically go on a >> > hunt for torn pages and the last known good copy via full-page write. >> >> Wow. How would you extract such a block image from WAL? >> >> That would be a great tool to have, but I didn't know there was any >> practical way of doing it today. > > Given pg_xlogdump that should be doable with 5min of hacking in 9.3. Just add > some hunk to write out the page to the if (config->bkp_details) hunk in > pg_xlogdump.c:XLogDumpDisplayRecord. I have done that for some debugging already. > > If somebody comes up with a sensible & simple UI for this I am willing to > propose a patch adding it to pg_xlogdump. One would have to specify the > rel/file/node, the offset, and the target file. Hmm. Cool. But, wouldn't the hard part be to figure out where to start reading the WAL in search of the *latest* FPI? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company